On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>wrote:
> > James Bowery <http://www.mail-archive.com/**search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&; >> **q=from:%22James+Bowery%22<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=from:%22James+Bowery%22>> >> Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 <http://www.mail-archive.com/** >> search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&**q=date:20121219<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=date:20121219> >> > >> >> Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex "lame brains" is not >> deciphering the "Mole" comment, but figuring out why "Lucky Saint" has not >> provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water. >> > > > One could easily fake this in a video, it would be trivial. It could be > done with, indeed, induction heating of the copper, that could be invisible > on the video, and *anything* can be faked in a video. But this could be > extremely difficult to fake with an in-person demonstration, where > observers could check everything -- except, to preserve "privacy" -- i.e., > intellectual rights, if those matter -- the contents of the copper cell. > Induction heating would require a visible device nearby. If "Lucky Saint" is sincerely attempting to help the world by releasing this technology, as he has presumably attempted by disclosing the fabrication technique, then it would be a small additional effort to post a video of a beaker of water containing the boiling device, with the beaker elevated on some sort of stand that would not plausibly contain an induction heater. Faking that video would be difficult enough to motivate a "Russ" type of fellow, who has access to the requisite resources, to proceed to replicate the recipe.
