On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
Any viable theory must explain lack of gamma radiation better than current > concepts - and any kind of Auger cascade will not do that – since the > radiation is detectable. In fact there are specialized instruments made for > that purpose. > If I understand the problem, I think any Augur cascade will be in the soft x-ray range. There are several reports of x-rays in connection with the Pd/D system. Sometimes there is a broad spectrum, and sometimes there is evidence of collimated emissions. > If there is a substantial population of Auger holes – where displaced > electrons carry away the impact energy – why are the electrons not > detected? They are the same energy as tritium beta emission, which is > easily detected. > I think it's hard to detect beta emission in a closed cell system, and you have to rely on gammas and indirect evidence of neutrons, both of which can leave a cell; please correct me if I'm wrong, here. Eric
