*“Anderson localization is the absence of wave diffusion in a disordered medium.*
*NiH requires an ordered medium. The more order the better”* LENR happens on the surface of nickel. It is well know that a rough surface is required on nickel for LENR to appear. This rough surface is central to the processes produced by Piantelli through surface preparation, Rossi through the production of tubules and hairs on his micro-particles and Ed storms through the production of cracks in palladium. *The do have a point, but it is superficial.* I believe that my point is fundamental. The roll of heat in LENR is to produce ionization and degenerate electrons. This can also be done by spark discharge as is practiced in the DGT process and by RF discharge in the case of Rossi. LENR is a process of heat catalyzed decoherence of a coherent entangled proton ensemble where one member of the proton ensemble membership produces energy when it enters an atom with a reduced coulomb barrier. Anderson Localization also concentrates high energy electrons around the cracks and/or metal hairs to lower the Coulomb barrier in and around those imperfections. Cheers: Axil On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m not convinced Anderson localization is relevant to NiH. **** > > ** ** > > Anderson localization is the absence of wave diffusion in a disordered > medium.**** > > ** ** > > NiH requires an ordered medium. The more order the better.**** > > ** ** > > Not only that, NiH requires an ordered medium in phonon semi-coherence, > which is somehow protected from phonon decoherence. IOW there will always > be thermal wave diffusion in this kind of reactor, and net gain can only > happen when thermal energy is added efficiently to keep this unwanted > diffusion from affecting phonon coherence. **** > > ** ** > > Thus – the need to add heat (usually) to an operating reactor - which > reactor is nevertheless gainful to begin with. That is an inherent logical > conflict which becomes the “knock” on the process - from skeptics. “If the > reaction is gainful, why do you need to add heat?” **** > > ** ** > > The do have a point, but it is superficial. **** > > ** ** > > Obviously, if there it excess heat in the process, one should ostensibly > need no added heat. But the non-obvious problem with that conclusion is > that instantaneous thermal loss occurs at the high end first, and must be > replaced there immediately, before decoherence can occur. **** > > ** ** > > Therefore, to maximize net gain, one needs to add only a narrow spectrum > addition of lock-in energy at the high end. Resistance heating – usually > employed - provides a broad spectrum, and therefore makes the net gain seem > less than it can be, or nonexistent without insulation.**** > > ** ** > > This added boost or “tickle” of input can be done most efficiently via > coherent wave addition using a laser, but only if it is energy in the > narrow spectra where it means the most – which is the trigger temperature. > **** > > ** ** > > If you must add broad spectrum heat to maintain phonon coherence, most of > it is wasted. Maybe 99% is wasted.**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil **** > > *“One way to define active sites for a gainful Ni-H reactor would be as a > "topologically decoherence-protected nanocavities (Casmir cavities or pits) > ** > filled with protons"***** > > Have you ever asked yourself what causes those protons to accumulate in > those nanocavities. After all, the protons are not little particles that > fall into the cracks. No, they are waves that obey the laws of Quantum > Mechanics.**** > > Cavities are not the only glue that attracts protons. Nano-hairs on nickel > micro-particles perform in the same way.**** > > They attract the protons and keep them very close to these > nano-obstructions. > > And the QM law that applies here is Anderson Localization.**** > > > American physicist Philip W. Anderson won the Nobel Prize for Physics in > 1977, for his research into the electronic structure of magnetic and > disordered systems, which led to the introduction of greatly advanced > electronic switching and memory devices for computers. **** > > So Anderson localization is a BIG topic in Physics.**** > > In 1958 he explored the phenomenon of electron localization, or Anderson > localization, wherein beyond a critical amount of impurity scattering the > diffusive motion of an electron halts. **** > > In 1959 he published a theory explaining "superexchange", an interaction > between the electrons of two molecular entities mediated by one or more > molecules or ions. **** > > In 1961 he developed what is now called the Anderson model, to explain the > behavior of heavy fermion systems.**** > > Today, it is interesting to note that Anderson localization is at the > forefront of experimental solid state and condensed matter Physics.**** > > Not too long ago, experimenters have verified that Anderson Localization > applies to matter waves (AKA protons).**** > > If you want to understand Ni-H reactor "topologically > decoherence-protected nanocavities (Casimir cavities or pits) filled with > protons" you should take some time and understand ANDERSON LOCALAZATION.** > ** > > **** > > Cheers: Axil**** > > > **** > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:* > *** > > Ni-H reactor would be as a > "topologically decoherence-protected nanocavities (Casimir cavities or > pits) > filled with protons"**** > > ** ** >
