From: Axil Axil
LENR happens on the surface of nickel. There is no evidence that LENR happens on the surface - as opposed to just below the surface. It is well know that a rough surface is required on nickel for LENR to appear. No. The rough surface does allows easier penetration into cavities beneath the surface for faster loading. However, a rough surface is not required. Many early experiments in LENR did not benefit from a rough surface. Loading is important, and if a surface treatment helps with loading, it will be useful - but that does not imply that the reaction happens on the surface. This rough surface is central to the processes produced by Piantelli through surface preparation, Rossi through the production of tubules and hairs on his micro-particles and Ed storms through the production of cracks in palladium. All of these permit easier penetration into cavities beneath the surface The roll of heat in LENR is to produce ionization and degenerate electrons. No the input heat is insufficient to cause ionization. There is no evidence of degenerate electrons in LENR. LENR is a process of heat catalyzed decoherence of a coherent entangled proton ensemble where one member of the proton ensemble membership produces energy when it enters an atom with a reduced coulomb barrier. Nonsense. You have it completely reversed. Anderson Localization also concentrates high energy electrons around the cracks and/or metal hairs to lower the Coulomb barrier in and around those imperfections. High electric field do indeed concentrate around cracks, but this is unrelated to Anderson Localization. I have to conclude that you do not understand even the basics of Anderson localization. Jones
