The 2 coils sound interesting, did the wires cross at some angle, either
within a coil or between the 2 coils?

Thanks.
John

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Hamdi Ucar <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hello John,
>
> The circuit is basically an single transistor oscillator based on TIP-3055
> where Collector-Vcc and Emitter-Gnd is connected through two air coils
> wound on a single  2 cm diameter empty fax roll, each 79 or 179 turns (I
> should find my notes) one CW other CCW, they meet at the center without a
> gap (this point called junction).  It is based on Ronald R. Stiffler
> circuit called BiPeg. The base is connected to emitter trough a coupled
> coil. The circuit oscillate in random manner, hardly to see any periodic
> oscillations, bursts are also present. The chaotic behavior is caused I
> think due to base-collector voltage goes beyond specs and cause
> intermediate failures. It was very difficult to tune the circuit for the
> proper regime, also, even tuned, circuit can oscillate in multiple modes.
> The  voltage difference at junction can be high as 90V. The O3 comes from
> point where two coils meets. No arc or hiss sound was present. Important
> thing is the O3 is only produced in a period of a month in summer where
> temperature was 30-35 degrees and more than 90% humidity. The O3 emission
> ceased when climate become normal. I later figured out that the O3 was not
> produced from O2 of the air but from H2O of the humidity. The reason of
> this was the experiments of John Kanzius showing salt water 'burned'. Ozone
> smell was very strong, and did not have a 'bitter' flavor which caused  by
> cheap HV ozone generators (may Nitrogen compounds are also produced).
>
> Regards
> Hamdi
>
>
> On 14-Jan-13 11:50, John Berry wrote:
>
> Hey Hamdi, Long time.
>
>  I am re-interested in a coil that you reported generating Ozone at low
> voltages.
>
>  Can you give some more detail on that one please?
>
>  Thanks,
> John
>
>  On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Hamdi Ucar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody remembering me,
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to