Can you send me a paper with your theory explained in details, with calculations and simulations? A story telling in a blog using some nonsensical words would not make it. Thanks,
Giovanni On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:05 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool, > > My theory explains Earth's magnetic fields, magnetotail, coronal discharge > jets and transmuted elements and the accretion of matter we live in. > > Can you explain all that? > > > On Monday, January 21, 2013, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > >> You can see here that you can have solid plasma: >> >> http://www.overclockersclub.com/news/30536/ >> >> Giovanni >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Chem, >> Maybe by use of "plasma" is not perfectly precise but for all purposes >> iron at that temperature is a plasma because it is extremely ionized. Yes, >> the usual idea of a plasma is that is a sort of gas but the main property >> really is that electrons are stripped away from the nucleus this is the >> case with the core of the earth. It is basically a plasma from this point >> of view. >> Giovanni >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:45 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Good discussion guys! **** >> >> Keeping the focus on the technical data, and so far you’ve been able to >> avoid getting personal… excellent!**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Giovanni, thanks for including the web-links to references… much >> appreciated.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> My only issue so far is with Giovanni’s statement:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> > The core <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_core> of the Sun is >> considered to extend from the center to **** >> >> > about 20–25% of the solar >> > radius.[46]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#cite_note-Garcia2007-47> It >> > has a density of up to >> **** >> >> > 150 g/cm3[47] >> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#cite_note-Basu-48>[48]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#cite_note-NASA1-49>(about >> > 150 times the density of water) and a >> **** >> >> > temperature of close to 15.7 million >> > kelvin<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin>(K) >> [48] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#cite_note-NASA1-49>.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> There is no way we could DIRECTLY measure either the radius of the Sun’s >> core or its density. The ‘accepted’ figures come from theoretical models; >> and applying those models to related variable. As far as the radius is >> concerned, your use of the phrasing, “… is considered to extend…” indicates >> your conscious understanding that the ESTIMATES of the Sun’s core radius is >> just that… and **estimate, not backed up by direct measurement**. >> However, when you state, “It has a density of upto…” seems to be a bit too >> ‘definite’ for my taste… **** >> >> ** ** >> >> This is a major problem I find in scientific papers. **Definitive** >> wording has crept into papers where it doesn’t belong; it is not warranted >> by the DIRECT experimental measurements. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> -Mark Iverson **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** >> >>
