I agree Rob. No patent is defendable at this stage. I believe that
Piantelli, Rossi et al. are wasting their time and money fighting over
patents. The real value will come later after the process is
understood and can be applied in the most efficient way. We are too
far from this goal to patent anything.
Ed
On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 22-1-2013 20:16, Edmund Storms wrote:
Of course Peter, this kind of reaction is expected. Patterson
objected to the F-P patent for the same reason - GREED. These
fights will become more common as the phenomenon gets closer to
making money.
Greed is a two edge sword. It gives incentive but it will also
cause the eventual destruction of life as we know it. During the
past, the negative effects were local. Now the effects are world-
wide, with a place to hide no longer available. Mankind is his own
worst enemy. We all know this but now the evidence is accumulating
and cannot be denied.
Ed
This exactly why this and associated patent(s) should be placed in
the Open source domain, so each and everyone can benefit from this
knowledge.
Kind regards,
Rob
