On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote:
after the > decision, the patent examiners are more likely to cite the wireless > networking as prior art and arguing that adapting it to other areas is > obvious to one skilled in the art. > Why are the patent examiners not claiming prior art with all of the silly software patents; those are surely obvious to anyone knowledgeable in the art. Eric
