Jones,
I don't think your leap of faith is restricted to [snip]"reversible fusion"
is slightly energetic [/snip] but rather that the cavity environment or NAE
is the energetic source where any 2 body relationship established at one
geometry can experience a discount toward disassociation when accomplished
at a different geometry. It establishes a linkage between the moving 2
bodies and the sharply serrated fields established by changes in Casimir
geometry. The geometry only has to accelerate or decelerate one body
relative to the other in an unbalanced manner to accomplish a discount. At
the most active geometry Casimir force trumps our square law isotropy and
whenever that geometry changes you get breaks or serrations in the isotropy
as the rules that limit these changes in value [square law vs Casimir
formula] come in conflict with each other. Naudt's paper on relativistic
hydrogen would hold that these bodies are unaware of their condition and
their underlying motive force is therefore still provided for by normal gas
laws such that no external energy has to be provided to load or transport
said bodies into lattice or between geometries. My posit is that these
changes in inertial frames are accomplished freely, easily and much more
rapidly via Casimir suppression than the relativistic effects we are more
accustomed to which require velocities in a Pythagorean relationship with C
or a very deep gravity Well.
Fran
From: Eric Walker
* why would any form of energy arbitration, in which a magnetic field is
used
to drain off a little bit of the mass of a proton, not also apply to
neutrons
and electrons?
The leap of faith is that "reversible fusion" is slightly energetic. There
could be reversible fusion with other nuclei but I doubt it, and am not
aware
of this type of reaction relating to anything other than P+P.
