I think each kernel is supposedly 5 MW x 9 in a reactor block On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> No, what I mean, the energy density of the box is way bigger than I > thought. > > > 2013/2/5 ChemE Stewart <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > >> Have you seen one ????? >> >> >> On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: >> >>> (45 kW of thermal energy in a self-contained 45x45x45cm box fully >>> automated with internal software and heat management system). >>> >>> I didn't know it was THAT POWEFUL! >>> >>> >>> 2013/2/5 Terry Blanton <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Defkalion's site, that is: >>>> >>>> http://defkalion-energy.com/ >>>> >>>> and it kinda makes me think that Tesla really was responsible for >>>> Tunguska. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> [email protected] >>> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> >
