The numbers are in line with what we have been expecting. I just hope that they will be willing to allow a qualified group to test one and put this issue to bed once and for all. What can we do to expedite the process?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Feb 5, 2013 10:24 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's Alive! I think each kernel is supposedly 5 MW x 9 in a reactor block On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: No, what I mean, the energy density of the box is way bigger than I thought. 2013/2/5 ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> Have you seen one ????? On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: (45 kW of thermal energy in a self-contained 45x45x45cm box fully automated with internal software and heat management system). I didn't know it was THAT POWEFUL! 2013/2/5 Terry Blanton <[email protected]> Defkalion's site, that is: http://defkalion-energy.com/ and it kinda makes me think that Tesla really was responsible for Tunguska. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected] -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
