I've just seem a TV document on Marie Curie, and really nothing will change.

people have the imagination that things get more tolerant, but it is always
the same, as explain nicolas taleb in anti-fragile...

rewriting the history of LENR will be done afterward, making physicist look
competent.

2013/2/16 Eric Walker <[email protected]>

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> If NASA fails, this will be a black mark.  Failure is not treated the same
>> way in LENR as it is in normal science. Beside, anyone who has studied the
>> theory must wonder about the competence at NASA.
>>
>
> Honestly, if LENR gets off the ground and gains mainstream acceptance, I
> see the possibility of it helping to influence the culture of physics in a
> new, more tolerant direction.  Who knows.  The current mode of intolerance
> and haughtiness is not flattering for physics.  I think it is ironic in
> this light that the field can also go in the other direction, towards any
> number of possibly unfalsifiable avenues of investigation in string theory
> and multiple universes and so on.  Perhaps it is just because these areas
> of investigation cannot easily be falsified that some physicists are able
> to carve out a respectable niche there.
>
> Most physicists will wonder about the competence at NASA if they pursue
> any LENR theory.  It is only a subset of LENR people that wonder about the
> competence of NASA's pursuing W-L.  I think NASA should have
> the latitude to keep on staff a few people who entertain oddball ideas;
> such people can still end up coming up with interesting and useful
> innovations.
>
> Eric
>
>

Reply via email to