You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000... http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-originally-thought/
Of course maybe it was just diffuse plasma. Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Eric Walker wrote: > On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:49, John Berry <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > It is interesting to note that the complete works of Shakespeare must > > also occur in Pi somewhere. (irrational, non ending and non > > repetitive > > I suspect there is an invalid assumption about randomness that we are > making when we go along with the old thought experiment of a corps of > eternally typing monkeys eventually producing Shakespeare's folio or > imagining that the folio can be found at some point transcoded in the > decimals of Pi. I wonder if there is already a mathematical proof out there > to the effect that the latter is an impossibility. > > I have not seen the video, but what has been described could possibly be > due to parallax with the frame of reference of the camera and arising in > connection with a piece of the meteor that split off at some point during > entry. > > I doubt the gravitational field of a ten ton meteor is strong enough to > keep much in an orbit of any kind. > > Eric >
