The biggest blunder is having an object hurdling at you @ 60,000 mph with the ability to take out a city and not even realizing it.
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: > It was just a horrible blunder. Even I got the number and the yield of the > explosion right. Just look at the beginning of this thread. > > > 2013/2/20 ChemE Stewart <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > >> You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000... >> >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-originally-thought/ >> >> Of course maybe it was just diffuse plasma. >> >> Stewart >> Darkmattersalot.com >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Eric Walker wrote: >> >>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:49, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > It is interesting to note that the complete works of Shakespeare must >>> > also occur in Pi somewhere. (irrational, non ending and non >>> > repetitive >>> >>> I suspect there is an invalid assumption about randomness that we are >>> making when we go along with the old thought experiment of a corps of >>> eternally typing monkeys eventually producing Shakespeare's folio or >>> imagining that the folio can be found at some point transcoded in the >>> decimals of Pi. I wonder if there is already a mathematical proof out there >>> to the effect that the latter is an impossibility. >>> >>> I have not seen the video, but what has been described could possibly be >>> due to parallax with the frame of reference of the camera and arising in >>> connection with a piece of the meteor that split off at some point during >>> entry. >>> >>> I doubt the gravitational field of a ten ton meteor is strong enough to >>> keep much in an orbit of any kind. >>> >>> Eric >>> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> >
