Actually I have calcs now on the menu on my site. I also show multi-body problem formulas and calculations for the core of the Earth. I have also been tracking orbits for 2 months and predicting low pressure systems. I am building an orbital model through the Google Earth API and fitting it to two Hurricane tracks from 2012. Also have a provisional patent filed.
All you have is another government conspiracy theory I can find plastered all over the Internet. I have falsifiable claims, one being that double rainbows with a dark band are thermodynamic and pull a vacuum and cool and condense water vapor. On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: > Your don't have a theory, ChemE. You have a lot of words and pictures at > a blog. No arithmetic. I've asked you for arithmetic repeatedly and you > refuse to be forthcoming. > > Moreover, you pretend that I said nothing about classified information. > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wow, I thought my theory was strange. > I think our space tracking capabilities for high speed > celestial objects are woefully lacking and we are sitting ducks. We have > civilians with HD video cams that are detecting these objects before the > governments. > > > > On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: > > OK so I'm going to go way out on a limb here and propose an explanation > for the "coincidence": > > It has been known for decades that asteroidal resources are a potential > material resource bonanza and also potential kinetic weapons. The fact > that it has taken until recently for private enterprise to enter the > picture<http://singularityhub.com/2013/02/19/interview-diamandis-planetary-resources-to-claim-high-value-asteroids-with-robotic-beacons/> > should > not blind us to the fact that detailed plans for asteroid husbandry have > existed for decades and that the spy satellite technology, now being used > by private asteroid prospecting, as been in use by government agencies for > decades -- including the military. > > We don't need to hypothesis exotic technologies to posit the potential > "black project" existence of asteroid husbandry technology that has enjoyed > a decades-long maturation period. The technologies existed, in > unclassified form, as early as the Apollo program. This is all that is > necessary to posit the "means" and "opportunity" (not the motive) for an > artificial "coincidence" between an earth-approaching asteroid and an > artificially controlled meteor: > > If advanced spy satellite technology had been used to do asteroid > prospecting over the last few decades, it is easy to imagine a much greater > precision assay of earth approaching asteroids exists in the "black" than > is known -- or at least admittedly known -- by unclassified sources. This > provides the "opportunity" in that it may have been known many years, > possibly decades, in advance that a 50m asteroid was going to pass within > GSO of Earth on February 15, 2013. > > As to means, if a nuclear power plant and/or large solar array were placed > on an earth-approaching meteoroid of modest mass, simply throwing chunks of > rock off its surface -- particularly while at apogee -- could provide > sufficient delta-v over the course of years to direct it to enter earth's > atmosphere at a low angle of incidence (thereby guaranteeing no substantial > serious ground effect), and do so in such a way that its entry would > approximately coincide with the near pass of the asteroid. > > Now for the motive: > > In intelligence agencies (yes I have had dealings including working in a > SCIF for months under daily review by the Joint Chiefs and Jasons on an > 'imminent nuclear war' priority project, so I do know a little) there is > something called a "signature" which provides a "plausible deniability" > cover to the mundanes while ensuring the message gets through to the > opposing side's intelligence agencies. Such a statistical anomaly > involving potential weaponry fits the bill of a "signature". The message > is simply this: We have sufficient control of the asteroid's little > brother that you might be wise to consider the possibility that we have > control of the asteroid. > > Remaining questions regarding the motive (as in means, motive and > opportunity) are: > > Why Russia? > > Why now? > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > A particularly relevant passage for those who get stuck on "clustering" of > random events (ToE: Theory of Everything): > > (R) Random universe. Actually there is a much simpler way of obtaining a > ToE. Consider an infinite > sequence of random bits (fair coin tosses). It is easy to see that any > finite pattern, i.e., any finite > binary sequence, occurs (actually infinitely often) in this string. Now > consider our observable universe > quantized at e.g. Planck level, and code the whole space-time universe > into a huge bit string. If the > universe ends in a big crunch, this string is finite. (Think of a digital > high resolution 3D movie of the > >
