Loading is
important however these are usually talked of as the bulk loading value.
Realize that dynamic conditions cause localized loading to be different than
the bulk. That is, for example, when a current is pulsed some D's are moved so
that they are closer than their equilibrium distances and some farther.
The highest
gain as a ratio is of course infinite. Some system self heat or continue to
heat after current is turned off. For
example, I have two spheres- sample and control- where one remains warmer than
the other for an extended time (months).
There are
also loaded wire samples that are part of “tank circuits” that continue to give
electrical currents (in the picowatt region) for months.
There have
been several "boil offs" where the metal continues to give off heat
for days after the electrolyte has boiled away.
explosives-
testing has been done by imploding samples (within Cu tubes and with RDX and
showing outward push against the tube). Only a few of those have been done to
my knowledge. There are have also been loading of shotgun shells with samples
resulting in greater net power (as measured by penetration through a stack of
celotex tiles). However, I think it is best to avoid weaponization of the
effect at this time.
The only
point to be made is that dynamic effects cause localized regions within samples
to appear to give the effect and that the effect appears to have a positive
temp. coeff.
Current
through samples: I am presently running currents through Pd loaded mesopore
carbon. I switched from Zirc oxide to be able to apply greater currents. It is
hard to estimate the voltage drop across individual metal clusters within a
powdered sample.
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:36:18 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:D or H loading...and other questions..
Ok for an electrolytic cell loading seems conceptually simple.
For a dry gas cell, it seems more difficult...
Rossi and Delalkian seem to just do temperature... (if you believe their
devices work at all)
Some have talked about Rossi doing some sort of thermo-electic effect....Celani
uses a big voltage drop across a long thin wire to migrate all the D to one
end...
Others have tried plasma discharge...
Has any one just tried a large DC bias just below the H(or D) break down
voltage?
Any general thoughts on H or D loading test samples in a gas cell?
The loading over 0.8 or so is absolutely necessary seems to get repeated a lot,
what is
everyones confidence in this statement? Brillouin claims that their Ni-H wet
cell works with only 15% loading, by applying their magic Q wave, the Q waves
seem to be about the same magnitiude (voltage and current) as many LENR
inducing waves in the literature.
Do people generally believe the 15% loading number?
Note one of Brilloin's claims was that any Ni will work, yet in the same
sentence they said all xx ft of a roll on Ni worked....
any sign that they ever got it to work with a different Ni supply?
They clearly transitioned from the wet cells to a pressurized gas cell and got
power gains of 2X....
A general comment:If as many suspect Pd-D is more energetic than Ni-H by 20X
then a Pd-D version fo the same cell wouldhave a power gain of 40 at 200 to
300C, that would actually be enough to close the loop and make real power...
Delkalion seems to have an independently verified claim of 3X in power
gain....'What is the highest realized power gain anyone has confidence is real?
Are there any interesting LENR experiments that led to a run away explosion
that have not been repeated?
I helped build a facility, "the Friends of Amateur rocketry", that is
properly equipped to build and test things that might go bang...We have fire
fighting, 18" think concrete bunkers etc....
this is a "Normal" day :
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEv8-7UleDc&list=UUZI0BwkiC2Vm9VuIeliRxmg&index=46)
