My theory on Tunguska. 1) The object exploded over Earth just like the recent Meteor did in Russia, leveling millions of trees. Good article here: http://www.qsl.net/w5www/tunguska.html
2) The area was covered with high traces of iridium, which is rare on the Earth's surface. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1999.tb01407.x/abstract 3) Iridium was also found at the K-T Boundary layer and is most prevalent at the Earth's core http://www.scn.org/~bh162/iridium.html 4) We are are being struck by "cores". Many of these meteors have the same type of dark matter core as the Earth, which triggers beta decay and low energy nuclear actions around it, creating the exotic metals seen in these comets and meteors. When they heat up in a mass-energy dense environment, like the atmosphere, the pressure builds at the center core's surface as it becomes energetic, builds pressure and the metallic shell explodes just like a nuclear pipe bomb. Same effect when comet Holmes exploded with nuclear force. 5) I think much of the asteroid belt might be left over entropic mass expelled from solar CMEs from that did not orbit into any planets and are out there collecting dust on their nuclear bubble, waiting to deliver their joy. As Clark Kent enters Earth's orbit he sheds his metallic armor and superman becomes just another thermodynamic upset in the atmosphere and sinkhole/seismic activity in the ground as he orbits for a while through the jet streams. Only difference is this is the Bizarro Superman not the good one. As a kid I built lots of explosive stuff and launched rockets. I also threw lots of snowballs and none of them exploded with the nuclear force of 30 Hiroshima bombs and all of them melted in the heat of the sun, unlike comet lovejoy which passed right through it. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:22 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone have knowledge of how bad things would have been had the > meteorite come straight in a vertical fashion? I suspect that the effect > would have been far worse. The distance traveled by this one through the > atmosphere was several times longer than it could have been. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 12:27 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Alexander Hollins < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> then it can be estimated to have happened 454 THOUSAND times in Earth's >> history. > > > This raises an interesting philosophical problem. The simultaneous > events were perhaps coincidence in a human timeframe (ours), and clearly > systematic in a geological timeframe. Does this point up a sort of > relativity of systematicity? > > Let me just say how cool it was to watch the meteor streak across the > sky in the video where it travels from left to right. And to think it was > 10,000 times heavier than the original 10 tons estimated for it. It was a > slow-burning nuclear bomb of sorts. I bet the special effects people will > be studying the videos for some time to get the optical effects right. > > Eric > >
