Jouni - for what it is worth, Iagree and also think it is flat and that Dirac's large number hypothesis (with slight modification) is correct - i.e. there is a time variation in the gravitational constant so not all the red shift is from expansion but some from larger G in the past. It is just I think that the variation is not constant nor linear in time. I should say- I took my Gen Rel from Dirac at FSU way back when...... we had long walks together (he lived near my appartment on Chapel Hill behind the statum) - he walked to work, but we never spoke much, he loved to walk. I think history has shown he was usually right. Dennis Subject: Re: [Vo]:The history of the universe will soon be revealed From: [email protected] Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:53:11 +0200 To: [email protected]
this is nice, I have waited this long time and data is finally here. Planck satellite data can make cosmology finally a real empirical science, not just playground for speculators. My predictions are that the flat geometry is confirmed and there are no positive evidences for inflation hypothesis, because it is a wrong hypothesis. Inflation, if it happened at all, cannot explain the flatness of the universe, but we need better models of cosmos. Universe must be gravitationally balanced, that is only thing that can explain flatness of the universe. This is my own prediction and this prediction differs wildly from mainstream interpretation of cosmos. —Jouni On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21828202 The first fractions of a second after the Big Bang cheers: Axil
