So far the microwave background is still best explained by standard cosomology. That doesn't mean big bang cosmology is right (since a flat universe obviously counts against it). The claim to fame of big bang cosomology is still the cosmic microwave background. No other cosmology predicted it.
harry On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com> wrote: > this is nice, I have waited this long time and data is finally here. Planck > satellite data can make cosmology finally a real empirical science, not just > playground for speculators. > > My predictions are that the flat geometry is confirmed and there are no > positive evidences for inflation hypothesis, because it is a wrong > hypothesis. Inflation, if it happened at all, cannot explain the flatness of > the universe, but we need better models of cosmos. > > Universe must be gravitationally balanced, that is only thing that can > explain flatness of the universe. This is my own prediction and this > prediction differs wildly from mainstream interpretation of cosmos. > > —Jouni > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21828202 > > The first fractions of a second after the Big Bang > > cheers: Axil
