Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: My impression is that NASA has done significant work with surface plasmon > effects and is absolutely convinced that they are such a breakthrough (in > other fields) that they are willing to overlook the problems as they > pertain to electrolysis LENR. . . . >
Ah. That sounds a little less assertive than your previous comments about the W-L theory. Do I sense that their high opinion of the theory gives you pause? That would be reasonable. I suggest you discuss it with them, directly. Perhaps they have seen something wrt cold neutrons which is not in the > public record. > It would not be NASA's own research, which is always made public. Why not ask them about this, as well? I have no stake in any theory, but I suppose it would be good for the theory-mavens to hash this out. - Jed
