Arnaud, He might be zeroing in on a method to prevent the self destruction but still get the larger COP..perhaps a thin layer of activated NAE needs to be surrounded by a lesser or non activated region that can still continue to process the plasma ignited by the "mouse" ... I suspect many of the repeatability issues are due to a self destructive geometry that wears faster with output levels. Fran
-----Original Message----- From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded What could mean a 2 stages eCat ? Is Rossi able to make different flavors of its magical powder ? One powder with low temp start but with slow kinetic (Low kW), called by Rossi the mouse One powder with high temp start but with fast kinetic (High kW), called by Rossi the cat This will allow better COP without loosing too much of control. Quoting Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > Rossi wrote: > > >> >> 1. Andrea Rossi >> March 25th, 2013 at 8:13 >> PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791&cpage=4#comment-664056> >> >> Dear Robert Tanhaus: >> 1- no, we revolutioned the technology separating the activation from >> the E-Cat, making 2 separated apparatuses in the same house: * mouse ( >> activator) and Cat. *This has enhanced the efficiency of the E-Cat. *Has >> been an idea I got during a night of fever and asma attack… I couldn’t >> sleep, it worked. >> 2- He is helping manufacturing the plants >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> * "House" here means chamber, or reaction vessel. > > Here is the question from Tanhaus: > > Dear Andrea Rossi, > > Wonderful!! > > I have two questions. > 1. Was the Hot Cat in Pordenone of the same model as the Hot Cats in the > 3rd party test now? > 2. Did your “new” partner helped you a lot designing these two stage > reactors? > > Thank you, > Robert Tanhaus > > > > - Jed >
