Control in Rossi’s reactor is proportional to the COP that it produces. Low COP provides good control, high COP suffers from poor control.
Now, the Rossi reactor is a two stage process with the mouse providing the control and the Cat providing the power. The mouse uses heat at a COP near one to give the Cat something it needs to operate at high power, and that thing is not heat. My guess is that the Cat food is electrons. The mouse converts input heat into electrons that feed the Cat. The Cat turns these electrons into more heat. Cheers: Axil On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Arnaud Kodeck <[email protected]>wrote: > Rossi uses electrical heating inside its eCats for controlling purpose. He > needs to be sure that the energy produced by LENR reaction inside the eCat > is below the maximum output possible (The coolant). Otherwise, the control > of the reaction will be lost and powder will overheat. If it's happen, the > powder looses its magic and the powder becomes LENR inert. Rossi stayed > that > a lot of times. > > The way of Rossi has presented the mouse/cat configuration let me think > that > there are 2 distinguished parts inside the vessel. I'm not convinced that > Rossi controls subtlety each NAE. > Arnaud > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: mardi 26 mars 2013 15:47 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded > > > > Arnaud, > > He might be zeroing in on a method to prevent the self destruction but > > still get the larger COP..perhaps a thin layer of activated NAE needs to > > be surrounded by a lesser or non activated region that can still continue > > to process the plasma ignited by the "mouse" ... I suspect many of the > > repeatability issues are due to a self destructive geometry that wears > > faster with output levels. > > Fran > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:41 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded > > > > What could mean a 2 stages eCat ? > > > > Is Rossi able to make different flavors of its magical powder ? > > One powder with low temp start but with slow kinetic (Low kW), > > called by Rossi the mouse > > One powder with high temp start but with fast kinetic (High kW), > > called by Rossi the cat > > > > This will allow better COP without loosing too much of control. > > > > Quoting Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > > > > > Rossi wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > >> 1. Andrea Rossi > > >> March 25th, 2013 at 8:13 > > >> PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791&cpage=4#comment- > > 664056> > > >> > > >> Dear Robert Tanhaus: > > >> 1- no, we revolutioned the technology separating the activation > from > > >> the E-Cat, making 2 separated apparatuses in the same house: * > mouse > > ( > > >> activator) and Cat. *This has enhanced the efficiency of the E-Cat. > > *Has > > >> been an idea I got during a night of fever and asma attack. I > > couldn't > > >> sleep, it worked. > > >> 2- He is helping manufacturing the plants > > >> Warm Regards, > > >> A.R. > > >> > > >> * "House" here means chamber, or reaction vessel. > > > > > > Here is the question from Tanhaus: > > > > > > Dear Andrea Rossi, > > > > > > Wonderful!! > > > > > > I have two questions. > > > 1. Was the Hot Cat in Pordenone of the same model as the Hot Cats in > the > > > 3rd party test now? > > > 2. Did your "new" partner helped you a lot designing these two stage > > > reactors? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Robert Tanhaus > > > > > > > > > > > > - Jed > > > > > > > >
