By the way, if Widom and Larsen use these LENR experimental proofs, this invalidates WL as a LENR+ theory.
Cheers: Axil On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > In LENR, there is direct experimental evidence for the existence of such > hot spots in before-and-after scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of > the surfaces of experimental LENR devices, some of which have lithium in or > around them. In post-experiment SEM images > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakSexperiment.pdf, a host of new, > weird looking micron-scale structures are observed scattered randomly > across the metallic surfaces. > > Various researchers have described these unusual structural features as > resembling “craters”, “volcanoes”, flash melted and cooled “puddles,” “gas > holes”, “ejecta from craters”, etc. Based on their appearance, they appear > to be the result of some sort of “flash” melting of the surface in small > sites at many locations. A US Navy group actually imaged an operating > cathode with an IR camera: hot spots in infrared looked like fireflies in a > field at night > In their paper, Widom and Larsen calculated LENR reaction rates based on > their theory and found they matched the experimental results. > > They also estimated the ‘noise temperature’ for such ‘hot spots’ to be 4 > 000 – 6 000 degrees Kelvin, comparable to the temperature on the surface of > the sun and above the boiling point of any metal. This is entirely > consistent with many experimental observations. > > Use some logic here. In the LENR+ Ni/H reactors developed by Rossi and > DGT, there are delicate nanowires attached to the micro-particles. 6000K > heat will destroy these important structures. > > Therefore 6000K heat does not occur in the Ni/H reactors. > > > Cheers: Axil > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > >> non destructive is one hypothesis. >> regenerative is another. >> >> craters have been observed, transmutation too... maybe the destruction >> regenerate the production instead of killing it. >> >> Maybe is a kind of controlled chaos/imperfection the source of LENR, like >> it is for some kind of superconduction, for laser existence, for >> semiconduction... >> >> Maybe what is killing LENR is not disorder, but annealing, or impurities >> segregation. >> >> not sure of any position. >> >> it is not time to close any door. >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> >>> We can use logic as a sensitive probe of LENR. >>> >>> Let’s explore the proposition; LENR+ is not self- destructive, since it >>> functions for a long time. >>> >>> A LENR theory that does not explain how the reaction is not >>> self-destructive is a false one. >>> >> >> >
