There is a limit to stability, once stability reaches that limit, there is no way to go but toward instability. As the EMF grows in strength, the nuclear forces become increasingly unstable. Given a sufficiently intense EMF field, sufficient instability can be achieved to overcome the fission limit. The key is to produce an irresistibly strong disruptive EMF to overcome the fission limit of the nucleus. This is the engineering challenge.
Cheers: Axil On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:53 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:54:02 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >When two things are balanced, the balance can be upset in two ways: you > can > >change the first thing or you can change the second thing. > > > >In either case the thing that was once balanced is now unbalanced. > > > >It does not matter how you get to the unbalanced state, the result is the > >same, fission. > > > ..but the two things are not in balance. The surface term, the Coulomb > term, and > the asymmetry term are all negative, but their sum is still less than the > positive volume term. If you decrease any of the three negative terms in > magnitude, then the difference with the volume term increases, i.e. the > nucleus > becomes more stable. > [snip] > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
