Have you heard about SPASERS yet? In order to explain the on again and off again nature of gamma radiation in LENR, the cause of the LENR reaction should include two states, one that mitigates gamma radiation and another state that can cause LENR and still produce gamma radiation.
The Spaser (short for surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) may be such a dual mode mechanism. The Spaser is the nanoplasmonic analogs of lasers: instead of photons, spasers generate coherent surface plasmons (collective electron oscillations at the surface of a metal) in a resonant nanoparticle. It is a DIPOLE driven mechanism. Heralded as ideal sources of coherent optical fields at the nanoscale, in a lattice of a nanostructure, spasers combined with electronic density waves on the surface of the nanostructure(nanowire). A spaser pumped by these electrical currents, rather than by the bulkier lasers used thus far in Nanoplasmonics. But recent theoretical papers have argued that electrically driven nanospasers would require unrealistically high currents. Now, Dabing Li presents a theoretical proposal for a nanospaser device that is pumped electrically via a nanowire. This is what happens in LENR+ reactors where nanowires pump spasers to produce the LENR+ reaction. The spaser is an EMF reaction that has two modes. One mode produces intense EMF screening currents but not coherent local fields because the current pumping is either under or over saturated with significant current loss. The other mode is when coherent widespread radiation is established and gamma radiation is spread among many coherent and entangled spacers. By the way, W&L think that spacers are causal in LENR but they just don’t know how. If they are looking into spasers, maybe so should you. cheers: Axil On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:18 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote: > Jones: > I don't think you're seeing the significance of my posting... I guess I > didn't do a good job of expressing my point. > > WHY OPPOSITE???? > > Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the nucleus from the > DOWN-spin quarks??? > [ I would propose that both are a dipole-like oscillation, just > 180deg > out of phase] > > Why do... > "All spin directions collapse on one or the OPPOSITE direction depending > on > the measured photon polarization." ??? > [this is the quote under one of the pics from the article] > > Why, in some nuclear interactions, do two gammas go shooting off in > OPPOSITE > directions???? > > Where is the physical model that explains the REASON why these observations > involve OPPOSITEs???? > > Is antimatter everywhere (because it's simply the other HALF of the > oscillation), but our measurement apparatus only detects one half of the > oscillation and sees that as 'matter'? > > Why is the magnetic field PERPENDICULAR to the E-field??? It's all > related... > > -Mark > > _____________________________________________ > From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! > > > Mark, > > Some of us only see a duck as a "downer" (cough, cough) > > Anyway, and from one fringe-of-the-fringe LENR perspective, this has > "strong > force interaction" written all over it, whether it is obvious to W-L > proponents or not. > > RPF(reversible proton fusion) would certainly interact with its surrounds > via spin (magnons) and would shuttle from one state (Helium-2) to another > (two protons) with only quark interactions to show for the experience. The > net energy deposited (or removed) is small per event, but happens at the > rate of blackbody phonon vibration (mid terahertz). > > Thus even micro(eV) energy change per event can get amplified rapidly, if > and when asymmetry is engineered into the reaction. > > ... hmmm... I'm now thinking of calling "quark color-change" as seen in RPF > as the "quark-quack" reaction ... nothing there but spin, so to speak... > thus giving detractors the satisfaction of calling the theory as > quack-derived ... yet all the while, the other LENR theories are falling > like ducks ... simply due to the obvious: not being able to adequately > explain lack of gammas. > > In the end, it should be crystal clear to anyone who understands nuclear > engineering - that there is no possible way to adequately explain the lack > of gammas in LENR - other than that they never happened at all. > > Jones > > From: MarkI-ZeroPoint > > The evidence is piling up that subatomic 'particles' are > dipole-like structures, and likely a type of dipole oscillation... > Looks, sounds, feels and quacks just like one... > ;-) > HTSITYS, > -Mark > [darn pics made msg too large so had to delete the piccys] > --------------------------- > > Researchers suggest one can affect an atom's spin by > adjusting the way it is measured > http://phys.org/news/2013-03-affect-atom-adjusting.html > > [GO to website to see picture] > >
