Has anyone looked to see that momentum is conserved in these processes?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Apr 4, 2013 5:45 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:29:42 -0700: Hi, [snip] >More disinformation. There is no possibility of nano-sized sites stopping >gamma radiation. This requires thick lead shielding. ..I have often wondered if an electron that is within the wavelength of a gamma (i.e. a "near field" energy transfer) might absorb the energy as kinetic energy. For a 23.8 MeV gamma the wavelength is 52 fm. For a Mills' Hydrino this is too small for even the smallest Hydrino, however if my version is correct, then it should be possible for f/H with a p > 32. (This probably won't stand up to much scrutiny, so don't look too hard. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
