Rossi has consistently refused to provide details of what is going on inside the E-Cat reactor, but he has mentioned that gamma rays have been detected. In a video interview when asked about whether the E-Cat was a ‘cold fusion’ technology he said, “we have found traces of fusion because we have found 511 kev gamma rays at the output, which is the emission of a positron and an electron, and a positron is the product of a proton turning into a neutron, so we have some kind of fusion inside, but I do not think this is the main energy source.” Exactly how these gamma rays are shielded is not clear, but Rossi has mentioned in the past that lead is used.
I think you should dream up another source for occasional gamma emissions to support your illusion other than radium. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil **** > > ** ** > > Your inexactitude in thinking is hard to overcome. Let us try another > piece of info as follows:**** > > **** > > When Rossi first stated his demonstrations and the public comments about > them, his first few shows were marred by a troublesome condition during > startup and shutdown where significant gamma radiation was produced… If > you remember, Celani said about the January 14 demo… **** > > ** ** > > The simplest explanation is that Rossi used a radioactive trigger for > startup - and then put it back in its cask. **** > > ** ** > > No one was allowed to witness Rossi’s startup, and the employment of an > easily identified radioactive starter like radium - could explain why. *** > * > > ** ** > > At no other time AFAIK - in the later tests, was any radioactivity > witnessed. Tests run in Sweden reported no radioactivity in the ash. **** > > ** ** > > I would say that it is your gullibility that is hard to overcome. **** > > ** ** > > It is incredulous that such a reaction could be a nuclear transmutation of > nickel to copper - and yet not leave radioactive ash.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
