I wrote:
> If Rossi's claims are ever fully substantiated, no one will say they were > "hype" or exaggerated. > That does not make sense. It came out: "if A then A." I meant "ramifications." If the claims are fully substantiated, meaning we determine there is no fraud or error, then the ramifications claimed by Rossi will be fully justified. It will be as revolutionary as he claims. Furthermore, despite all the blather on the Internet, I have not seen any sign of fraud or error in any test by Rossi. His tests are unforgettably sloppy, but not in error as far as I know, or as far as anyone else knows. In my opinion, no plausible method of fraud has been proposed. I am aware that other people disagree. - Jed
