In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:41:16 -0400: Hi Axil, [snip] >http://crystalchannelers.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/new-science-the-widom-larsen-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-lenr-theory/ > >W&L has gone with Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) electrons. This is a >mistake,they cannot do this because of the lack of energy density in the >SPP, IMHO. > >The W&L theory must be totally revamped is they want to use SPPs as they >should. > >Cheers: Axil
I'm a little confused here. If you don't think WL is applicable, then what mechanism involving SPPs do you envisage is responsible for CF? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
