The recent verification of the Higgs mechanism shows a connection between the electroweak force and spontaneous production of the W-bosons, W+ and W- involving spontaneous symmetry breaking.
When sufficient electromagnetic charge carrying gage photons are concentrated near the nucleus of the atom, The coupling constant between the charge carrying photons and the Higgs field will increase sufficiently to produce W+ or W- electroweak bosons that will change a neutron into a proton through color change in one channel or produce alpha decay through another channel. I am working on this idea so it is still raw. But your opinion is always valuable. See: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CG4QFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lhep.unibe.ch%2Fimg%2Flectureslides%2F70_2010-5-25_Particle-Physics-8.pdf&ei=X1F0UevNDsmS0QGOsYG4DQ&usg=AFQjCNH41HEKT-aA42cw_npg2ocsasTUSA&sig2=1_jRdjEcFg6mAOrk0bZyRw I need some time to learn the Higgs mechanism in more detail. Cheers: Axil On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:41:16 -0400: > Hi Axil, > [snip] > > > http://crystalchannelers.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/new-science-the-widom-larsen-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-lenr-theory/ > > > >W&L has gone with Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) electrons. This is a > >mistake,they cannot do this because of the lack of energy density in the > >SPP, IMHO. > > > >The W&L theory must be totally revamped is they want to use SPPs as they > >should. > > > >Cheers: Axil > > I'm a little confused here. If you don't think WL is applicable, then what > mechanism involving SPPs do you envisage is responsible for CF? > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
