Robin,

If you haven't already read the following reference, it may be relevant-

"Highly localized quantum elastic processes in solids"
http://www.lacrimae-rerum.it/documents/Highlylocalizedquantumelasticprocessesinsolids.pdf

- which discusses (p.281) the apparent conflict between relativistic
causality and the Mossbauer effect.

Also -
"Physical discussion of the Mossbauer effect"
http://www.lacrimae-rerum.it/documents/PhysicaldiscussionoftheMossbauereffect.pdf

-- Lou Pagnucco


mixent wrote:
> In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:48:17 -0700:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>>If the excess were lower
>>- in the range of what a beta decay "would have been with a real neutron"
>>instead of a VN, everything would be dandy.
>
> A real neutron also leaves too much energy to account for:-
>
> n + 62Ni => 63Ni + 6.84 MeV
>
> Furthermore, in this case there is no electron to carry the energy, so it
> can
> only exit as gamma rays, which have not been detected, or possibly
> distributed
> throughout the mass of Ni via some other means....
>
> Which brings me back to the Mössbauer effect. It is claimed that the
> entire
> lattice absorbs the "kick back" from the emission of the gamma photon,
> however I
> wonder if there is anyway to distinguish this from the situation where the
> nucleus in question concurrently receives a push from a random phonon that
> just
> happens to precisely compensate for the kick back from the photon.
>
> If the latter is ruled out, then precisely what is the physical mechanism
> that
> allows the momentum to be shared by the entire lattice concurrently?
>
> Taking this one step further, what if LENR reactions make use of this
> purported
> mechanism to transfer momentum to two opposing halves of the lattice,
> pushing
> each half in the opposite direction? Thus momentum is transferred to the
> entire
> lattice, and the energy is distributed equally across all atoms
> concurrently,
> since each atom is slightly displaced. In short the energy is as it were
> stored
> in billions of tiny springs all at once.
> When these springs "unwind", the energy is converted to heat, already
> distributed throughout the lattice.
> (Lattice in this context may only be a single crystal within the metal, or
> perhaps even only a single row of atoms within a crystal.)
> Note that such a mechanism would allow pure fusion (as opposed to a
> fusion/fission reaction), without emission of any particles, or ionizing
> radiation of any kind.
>
>>
>>If you like the VN possibility - then chose your second miracle:
>>mass-depleted proton or neutrino...
>
> ...or energetic electron, or Mössbauer effect(?)
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>
>


Reply via email to