-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] My hope is that the Li-battery industry with a projected market in the tens of billion$ should have strong incentive to produce a safe product.
Imagine the law suits if a new "improved" battery brings down one (or two) jumbo jets - not to mention lost revenue from people who stop flying. Also - imagine that the study of lithium batteries uncovers part of the puzzle of LENR! Aside from battery failures - there are reports circulating now about lithium batteries which have achieved anomalous energy density - far over chemical energy storage potentials. Why should we be surprised? This is the flip-side of the failure model. If Boeing knows anything - it is how to convert a problem into a "feature" - so why have they dropped the ball this time? ANS- they think LENR is pathological science. The fact that Boeing has thrown $10s of millions at the problem and NOT discovered what it is, that alone is itself strong evidence that they have NOT looked at LENR. As far back as 1990, at the very first ICCF, there is a paper showing anomalous energy using a lithium electrolyte. Fast forward 23 years, and Boeing is seeing anomalous energy from a lithium electrolyte causing battery failure and yet LENR is not considered relevant! How bizarre is that? That is the legacy of mainstream physic's denial of the PF effect. Jones
