Ed Storms states: In other words, the cracks make CF when they grow only to a small gap, but can cause fractofusion if they grow large rapidly.
Axil begins: In regard to experimental observation of crack dynamics as follows: https://www.google.com/#q=miley+bose+einstein+condensation&hl=en&ei=wq-GUY-EIJP-4AP2yoEY&sqi=2&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&fp=5ebeced8323f36c9&biw=853&bih=511 ADVANCES IN PROPOSED D-CLUSTER INERTIAL CONFIMENT FUSION TARGET “Recent superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID) measurement has shown ultradense states of deuterons with many more than 100 deuterons within a crystal defect in a palladium crystal are possible, and a superconductive state of these clusters was demonstrated in these experiments [1, 2]. Similar ultra-dense state of deuterons was seen at surface defects of iron oxide resulted in ion energies of 630 eV through Mass spectrometry measurements [3]. It may well be assumed that both cluster states are of the same nature though the states are concentrated at the surface in the iron oxide case due to the catalytic generation in contrast to the Pd samples with localization in the bulk volume [2]. In both cases their existence was confirmed by the LENR process [4] which likewise should be valid including when an inverted Rydberg state is present. [3] A very important application would be using these clusters to achieve non-cryogenic targets for inertial confinement The Sixth International Conference on Inertial Fusion Sciences and Applications IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 244 (2010) 032036 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/244/3/032036 _c 2010 IOP Publishing Ltd 1 fusion. In principle this could also provide a compressed fuel density up to about 1000 times solid state density. [2][5][6].” What Miley has seen in these cracks is a polariton condensate composed of electrons an associated deuterons undergoing Plasmon excitations caused by dipole charge separation. A crack is a geomantic mechanism or Nano antenna where electrons an infrared radiation combine to form a polariton condensate. The existence of a superconductive state indicates the the condensates involves boson condensation at room temperature. Other theories of LENR will be hard pressed to explain why room temperature superconductivity is manifest in nano-optical crack. What produces such high energy levels and what causes such high densities? The polariton will produce these effects. This is not imagination, this is experimental observation. On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Eric, I assume that a single mechanism causes CF. This mechanism does not > produce energetic particles because if it did, they or their secondaries > would be easily detectable when multiple watts are produced, as > occasionally happens. Therefore, I reject any energetic emission as being > related to CF. This encourages me to look for a different explanation, > which seems to be a rare approach in the field. I suggest all energetic > particles result from hot fusion that can occur at low level as the > conditions supporting CF form. In other words, the cracks make CF when they > grow only to a small gap, but can cause fractofusion if they grow large > rapidly. Both process happen as a result of crack formation, but result > from a different mechanism. This explanation allows all observations to be > fit by one process, one assumption, and to occur at the same time. > Personally, I like the simplicity of such an approach. However, simplicity > does not seem to be the accepted approach is these discussions. > > Ed Storms > > > > > On May 5, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > > The very small number of alpha and neutrons can be explained without >> assuming CF is the cause. >> > > I guess this is the conclusion I'm trying to better understand -- I > understand the part about neutrons. It is the "very small number alpha" > particles that I'm querying. I think you allude to this below, but I'm not > sure if that is the only basis for this conclusion. > > >> Fast particles make secondary radiation that can be easily detected. >> Peter made calculations showing the energy limit required to avoid detecton. >> > > I take it that an important assumption here is that (1) the radiation is > broadband (sounds sensible) and (2) it extends into a range beyond what is > going to be stopped by the glass or metal housing enclosing the system. Do > you expect the peak of the secondary radiation to be significantly above > the threshold at which the glass or metal will stop it? > > >> You should read his papers. Here is a list. >> > > That is a long list. I'm glad that you highlighted some of them! > > Eric > > >
