Hi, On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote:
> You need positive credible evidence to convince people that cold fusion is > real. And there isn't any. > It's a little painful to watch this thread, Joshua. Here you assert that positive, credible evidence has not been provided, after people have provided positive, credible evidence -- not all of it, but some, it seems to me; sufficient evidence, at any rate, to build a prima facie case that we should all go do some more reading. Later on will then no doubt go on to assert once more that positive, credible evidence has not been provided. It ultimately gives one the impression not of a search after truth but of a contest of wills. If I had my guess, this is in fact what it is. Once we get to that conclusion, it's just a matter of trying to figure out what the purpose might be. Eric
