Thanks, I am trying to get up to speed on subatomic particles, bosons, fermions and such, I mostly have a practical thermodynamic and power background. I too believe that mass and energy are changing states to/from and the second law needs some work...
For those interested, my research and theory has led me to believe that our Sun and Earth are actually branes (from string theory), a black hole is considered a black p-brane, probably 5 dimensions(or more) all curled up at their core with a significant amount of mass/energy contained within. We reside in the baryonic crust built up around Earth's brane. She has attached strings (1-branes) connected to her at her magnetic poles. There are also probably open strings attached between Earth's brane and the Sun's brane (1-2 strings) in the solar wind. The sun is creating and streaming smaller branes (particles, closed strings(toroids) and membranes) towards Earth in the solar wind, expelling more energetic/massive branes during CMEs. These expelled branes are orbiting through and around the Earth and are creating our gravity field as they evaporate and these subatomic particles are flowing to the Earth's core. The most energetic strings are also pulling larger vacuums in the atmosphere and creating disturbances seen as waterspouts, tornadoes, hurricanes, etc. which all have strings within or above pulling a vacuum, condensing water vapor and creating the extreme low pressures seen in our atmosphere along with the jet streams. The strings evaporate gravitationally over time, nature sees to it else we could not exist with all of that vacuum energy surrounding us. The branes are also creating weak spots in the baryonic crust of the Earth as they enter into it and are triggering seismic events and sinkholes. Much of the lightning we see is just the electromagnetic discharge created from the interaction of these strings. All of our severe weather systems are really just vacuum upsets in the atmosphere from these branes. We reside in a quantum field that our senses cannot directly detect but we see the results and have given them all sorts of names. Here are a couple good reads on string theory. http://www.superstringtheory.com/ http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/string-theory-for-dummies-cheat-sheet.html I am just trying to show that dark/vacuum energy, quantum gravity and string theory all can be explained by what we know as our severe weather and other high energy upsets on Earth such as some of our seismic activity. I may be wrong, but the pieces seem to fit and I am getting lots of reads on my blog from 185 countries, it might be my stupid humor, I do not know. The recent dark lightning discovery and such also support my theory. Those interlocking ice halos and interlocking rainbows seen in the sky before hurricane Sandy were actually "cosmic strings" with some bad-ass amounts of vacuum energy creating lots of ice crystals in the atmosphere as they suck the entropy out of the surrounding gas. If the Earth were just a rock in space like the geologist believe it would be a lot more boring around here. The sun has just had three X class solar flares over the past couple of days, most of it has missed us. Might be some rock'n and roll'n here at the end of the year at 11 year solar max with a big ass comet on the way. Spaceweather.com is a good site to check on. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Stewart, > > If mass can be converted to energy in packets of a fractional eV up to a > few > tens of eV, which seems to be a feature of many LENR theories - and the > reaction is reversible so that energy can be converted into mass - the > problem resolves to locating a nucleus which can vary in mass slightly > without necessarily changing identity. > > The "transfer medium" between mass and energy - is thought by some > theorists > to be the quantum of spin - the magnon. > > In the case of Ahern's EPRI work - the endothermic reaction ONLY occurred > when titanium was part of the nanopowder. > > Since titanium has also been associated with gain in other experiments, it > would probably be the best lattice metal to concentrate on - in order to > show which parameters induce endotherm and which induce exotherm. Titanium > has two high spin isomers: 47 and 49 and a number of odd physical > properties > that point to how one could engineer an experiment. > > Jones > > > From: ChemE Stewart > > Thanks Jones, I have read so much stuff my head is spinning > like a toroid. I remember Celani last year talking about temperature > inversions during loading/heating phase of his wires for his > demonstrations. > Jed has documents on his site discussing this from older studies, not sure > about recent. > > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFtheeffecto.pdf > > I have liken it to a thunderstorm. When a low pressure > system rolls through it can pull a vacuum/create low pressure in the > surrounding gaseous atmosphere and cool things off overall but if you > happen > to be close to lightning discharge within the area you might get very hot, > very fast... That lightning may be originating from a NAE since they have > detected positron emissions, neutrons, etc.. during storms > > Stewart > Actually there are four reports of LENR endothermic > reactions, including Arata and Ahern > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2012/2012EPRI-1025575-Ahern.pdf > Probably more examples were seen and written off as > calibration error, since endotherm is so unexpected. > Unless part of the "reaction" is > endothermic > and cools its surroundings... > I do not think anyone has ever detected an > endothermic cold fusion reaction. You could detect that with a calorimeter > as easily as you can detect an exothermic reaction of the same magnitude. > > >
