On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote:
> Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote: > > THAT is one of the strangest assertions I have ever read, in all the >>> years I have been reading strange comments from skeptics. Seriously, that >>> takes the cake. >>> >> >> Maybe you don't understand what "converse" means. >> > > Maybe you do not understand what physical causality means. Also time. You > don't get the idea that when X is followed by Y, Y did not cause X. > > How on earth can excess heat cause high loading to occur before the heat > itself ensues?!? > > Explain that, and you will win a Nobel prize. > > Sorry, you're not making sense. Correlation and causation are different things. I did not say heat produces loading. Even if you were right that loading produced heat, the figure does not show it works every time, which is what you claimed it showed.
