On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, it is weak compared to the power of a Tokamak reactor, although it > often produces a lot more energy. (The tokamak record is 6 MJ; the cold > fusion record for Pd-D is around 150 MJ I think.) > > Not that it makes much difference, but just to keep it factual, the JET has produced 675 MJ (rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/357/1752/415), and that result is unchallenged. And the power record is 16 MW. Both figures far higher than the highest *claims* from cold fusion. > It is not a bit random. > Storms calls it erratic, and dependent on luck and nature's mood. > As I said, McKubre's Fig. 1 shows that it is completely predictable. If > you can load the metal to 94% the effect always turns on. > That's not what the paper says. The figure plots the loading in experiments that showed excess heat. So, it means if you see excess heat, the loading is high. It does not show the converse, which is what you claim.
