If there is an afterlife, Feyerabend might be laughing at anything that suggests 'method' !
If I had the time and skills, I'd write a blog/book on what I call "Atheist Theology" - a deliberate oxymoron. If science is wholly based on reductionism and materialism, then it is functionally atheistic. But if that's the case, why not adopt the view that the Cosmos is a patchwork - and that it doesn't have to be consistent? That it may rely on paradoxes? Theorists seem to enjoy spinning theories that are 'elegant', 'beautiful' - is this view justified - or useful? The subject seemed to be close to the heart of Einstein, who rejected a personal Deity, but still sought order and elegance. I'm interested in emergent phenomena - things that may not have any further explanation: ghosts, poltergeists, etc. In regard to Cold Fusion ( and much else), I'm blown away by the fanatical insistence on theory above all reality. To paraphrase a current slogan: 'it's here, it's queer, get used to it'
