Joe, As time advances Rossi is improving his design. He has made marvelous progress during the last couple of years and I hope that we can convince him to begin production of a useful device soon. It is reasonable to assume that the drive system can be of a single phase which is less complicated to implement than a three phase one. He may have determined that it will be easier to supply the drive requirements for a number of connected modules in this new configuration and that might be the reason for the change. We will have to wait for that information.
I suspect that the final system that holds Rossi's ECATs will have a coolant flowing to remove the internally generated heat instead of radiating it as for this test. A coating may not be required for the normal operation but must be used for this test to keep operation within reasonable limits. His decision to allow this test no doubt forces him to do things that he does not do in the final product. An example would be the temperature of the outer surface which will be held to around 300 C in his system but in this test is much hotter. This temperature variation will have a large impact upon stable operation with drive further complicating these tests. It is about time for him to allow the third party testing! The good news is that this suggests that he feels that his design is close to final. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joe Hughes <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 10:46 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Two things that confuse me about the two tests. First, they both utilized completely different power sources that were supposedly part of his trade secret. the supply during the first test was a three phase supply but the second one was a single phase output supply. Is it practical that for the power to be so critical to this device for him to be able to switch power inputs so easily or is the power not important and this is just Rossi trying to distract folks from the real magic in his system? Second, Rossi is incredibly paranoid and for good reason i might add, so was their something the first test showed that he was concerned about which caused him to 'paint' the second ecat to hide something? I'm hypothesizing that the uneven paint job was an afterthought to hide something and not prepared purposefully like that. Also why did he agree to the test now? Is he comfortable enough in his progress in the design and with his partners now that he is willing to begin sharing with others or is it some form of misdirection play on his part? Also I always enjoyed reading Dr. Kim's papers on lenr and i think these tests make some of those theories less plausible, however would love to read his comments on the tests. i don't believe he has ever posted on here. Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: The remaining "output hoax" possibility is beamed RF into the "antenna resistors". Now, I do realise that this entails Prof. Levi crawling around in the rafters like Quasimodo...LOL. No, I am inclined to say that the input side is where attention needs to be focussed. There's a black box there - the waveform generator - that's off limits. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: David Roberson To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:47 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem You definitely should drop any reference to powerful lasers. Can you imagine the liability that Rossi would face when reflections or direct path radiation caused serious injuries? This is far outside the realm of reality. The input questions are much more relevant, and I suspect that they can be set aside with the proper scrutiny. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Andrew <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 9:27 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Hey, I admit that's a bit far out. But lasers can be straightforwardly coerced into producing something that's not a spot, you know. If there's foul play, my money is on the input side, frankly. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: David Roberson To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem And, of course, the reason that they misread the instruments was that they were all blinded by the high power IR. Give me a break. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 6:52 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Mr. Gibbs, welcome to our world. Andrew, infrared lasers? Really. Okay, somehow these scientists missed the hidden CO2 laser which would create spot heating of the test device. :-)
