Excellent analysis, Jones. You have nailed the essential reason why
this is not a scam. Jed has done the same. Instead, Rossi is doing
what other people do all the time in all aspects of science and
commerce, but he is doing it under a microscope. Most similar efforts
are just as filled with reasons to critique, but no one cares to do
this. In fact I have reviewed hundreds of papers and I have never
found a single one that did not contain a flaw or poor explanation
that a determined critic could not exploit. Rossi is doing a good job
under difficult circumstances. I wonder how well the skeptics would
perform if they were in Rossi's shoes?
Ed Storms
On May 22, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
I think that there is plenty enough benefit that Rossi has a good
paying job. He does not need to make millions out of it, but it is
plenty enough that he receives enough capital for adequate living
standards.
This would be the world's worst way to make a living! Rossi has a
difficult time with money. He has spent tremendous amount of his own
money on this. If he engaged in a con game he has conned himself.
He is the least convincing confidence man I have ever heard of.
Plus, AR sold his biofuel company EON for about one million Euro and
could have retired comfortably to Miami on that income. This is a
matter of public record.
Instead - he reinvests the proceeds of the EON sale into his
project ! Does that sound like a scammer?
It is preposterous that anyone would claim that he does this sale of
a profitable company – and then reinvestment the proceeds to
perpetuate as scam, with which to obtain enough capital for
“adequate living” when he already had that to begin with. Instead he
has to go through the constant reminders of his past legal
difficulties, in order to find a solution to one of societies
greatest problems?
Get a life! These people like Krivit, etc - who blindly suggest scam
because they personally were not honored with a demo - ought to at
least do their homework first and read what is available in the
public record before spouting crap about scam, since there is no
plausible motive which would be worth the risk.
Jones
