We might find out how the skeptics do in Rossi's shoes soon. They are facing some difficult times trying to prove that Rossi and the third party tests are not accurate. I wonder how fast they can backpedal?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Edmund Storms <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Cc: Edmund Storms <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, May 22, 2013 1:13 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Excellent analysis, Jones. You have nailed the essential reason why this is not a scam. Jed has done the same. Instead, Rossi is doing what other people do all the time in all aspects of science and commerce, but he is doing it under a microscope. Most similar efforts are just as filled with reasons to critique, but no one cares to do this. In fact I have reviewed hundreds of papers and I have never found a single one that did not contain a flaw or poor explanation that a determined critic could not exploit. Rossi is doing a good job under difficult circumstances. I wonder how well the skeptics would perform if they were in Rossi's shoes? Ed Storms On May 22, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Jones Beene wrote: From: Jed Rothwell Jouni Valkonen wrote: I think that there is plenty enough benefit that Rossi has a good paying job. He does not need to make millions out of it, but it is plenty enough that he receives enough capital for adequate living standards. This would be the world's worst way to make a living! Rossi has a difficult time with money. He has spent tremendous amount of his own money on this. If he engaged in a con game he has conned himself. He is the least convincing confidence man I have ever heard of. Plus, AR sold his biofuel company EON for about one million Euro and could have retired comfortably to Miami on that income. This is a matter of public record. Instead - he reinvests the proceeds of the EON sale into his project ! Does that sound like a scammer? It is preposterous that anyone would claim that he does this sale of a profitable company – and then reinvestment the proceeds to perpetuate as scam, with which to obtain enough capital for “adequate living” when he already had that to begin with. Instead he has to go through the constant reminders of his past legal difficulties, in order to find a solution to one of societies greatest problems? Get a life! These people like Krivit, etc - who blindly suggest scam because they personally were not honored with a demo - ought to at least do their homework first and read what is available in the public record before spouting crap about scam, since there is no plausible motive which would be worth the risk. Jones
