Have a bit more of a think about it Jed, IR laser beams wouldn't need to be any more intense than the heat being radiated by the E-cat. In fact by shining in from multiple directions they could be less intense than the emitted heat from the E-cat (like concentrating relatively diffuse sunlight to make something hotter at the focus point). So how would that "burn or blind people"? Are you burnt or blinded by looking at something glowing red-hot?
As for the other; are you seriously disputing that 2kW of AC electrical power could be sent through those wires to the Ecat? Take test 1: If 400V rms AC was connected then that is only 5A rms which a 1mm diameter copper wire can easily handle. Now set up your 'visible' signal to be 50hZ 400V 2.5A turned on about 1/3 of time. Meter detects this with ease. Add a 50khz AC 400V rms 4A rms AC supply to that and you deliver another 1600W that is invisible to the low frequency sensitive meter. Knowing more about the meter would allow more sophisticated choices to beat it. DC might also be undetectable depending upon the instruments used. Neither of these scenarios is likely, but they don't appear to be ruled out by what is published. The November melt-down demo is also very interesting. On 22 May 2013 23:15, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote: > > >> You are joking! I have seen lasers strike objects, such as the items in a >> cash register checkout line. You can't miss that. It is obvious. We have >> all seen it. >> > > Oops. You said infrared lasers. My mistake. > > My other points hold. People would be burned and blinded. > > It just isn't possible. > > - Jed > >
