What makes the Rossi demos more believable these days is the Rossi reactor’s increase in power density over these last two years. As the power density increases, the upcoming Rossi demos will be proportionately more believable.
True, a self-sustained mode is the ultimate in power density. From an engineering standpoint, this can be done if the power density can be pushed high enough to allow for some static electric charge to be drained from inside the reactor due to charge buildup from the LENR reaction in order to feed a spark discharge stimulator. DGT may be able to do this in the future if their COP continues to improve but not Rossi. On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > Jed, > > Yes - that's why webcams would be "nice" but not particularly useful for > uncovering deliberate fraud. That is precisely why I (and Duncan Cumming) > are calling for a test whereby there is no power input for a decent amount > of time. If there is no power input, there's nothing than can be fudged > past the limitations of the measurement equipment. > > How do you know that the power meter was not selected by Levi and given to > the group? What kind of researcher would not put a scope on the cable? or > would break open the cable to check for trickery? The testers did neither > of these things, and that's perhaps because not one of them was a competent > EE, and/or trusted Rossi to not try and fool them. They left that barn door > wide open. It says little for their common sense, quite frankly. > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Saturday, May 25, 2013 1:10 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:web feed > > Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > > ** >> I'd like to see the next LENR test devised so that the possibility of >> fraud is dramatically reduced. >> > > It would be fun to put the test on web video but I do not see how this > would reduce the possibility of fraud. If the people doing the test all > want to commit fraud they can easily set up a test that looks completely > convincing. > > If you do not trust Levi et al. to make an honest report and to publish > real data, a video will not be more convincing to you than their report is. > If you think their method is incompetent, seeing it performed in real time > on video will not sway you. > > Many skeptics already say that Levi and the others who wrote the latest > report are in cahoots with Rossi. They are all engaged in fraud together. > Other skeptics claim there are special circuits in the wall which can > deliver enough power to melt steel and ceramic, magically without melting > the wire from the wall to the power supply. If that were true, a video > would not reveal it. The secret circuit is hidden from view. > > A skeptic can make up any number of other scenarios. It makes no > difference how far fetched these scenarios become. As I pointed out before, > the skeptics assume Rossi has magical ESP so that he knows what kind of > power meter they will bring, so he can set up everything just right to fool > that particular meter. > > - Jed > >
