Thanks to referring to my blog paper. Anyway I think your question cannot be answered by a duel between theories or by logic alone. DGT will publish relevant analytical data. My bet is that more parallel processes happen in those NAE and no single theory can explain them all. Peter
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > I just read Peter’s article > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/06/some-questions-regarding-ed-storms-new.html > on Ed Storms theory. After several exchanges with Ed here on vortex this > weekend, I am willing to admit the hydron is a better theory than my > endless reaction between H2 and H1 precipitated by changes in Casimir > geometry. I am not willing however to dismiss the change in Casimir > geometry as the bootstrap mechanism behind what Ed terms “NAE” or my > relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect which explains the anomalous > decay effects reported for radioactive gases. I believe in conservation of > miracles and that all these anomalous claims should track back to a single > quantum effect applied in different ways. I suspect Reiseifenschweiler > effect, sono fusion and plasma engines are all cousins with a common > underlying criteria [DCE]. Ed’s theory provides a new pathway -linkage that > allows energy to be extracted out from the “hydrons” to the walls of NAE > where it can be exploited as thermal energy. The covalent resonating H2 ion > is both plausible and worth pursuing, at worst it would still result in > VERY useful clues. At best Ed may have nailed it and Peters focus on trans > theories can simply wait to fall out from the race for IP that will ensue > the minute OU is validated. **** > > Fran**** > > ** ** > > Question #2: The model will be a "trans-theory" only to the extent that it > is acknowledged as plausible and worth exploring. This acceptance is not > assured at this time. As for whether one or many theories are required > depends on how many ways Nature has to cause LENR. I assume only one basic > method is possible. Therefore, only one theory is needed, i.e. the correct > one. We will have to wait until the proper tests are made to determine > which theory is correct. My model shows exactly which tests need to be done. > **** > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
