No extra weight whatever. The NDA would not be for the purposes of
convincing anybody about the demo. It would be for the purposes of
allowing engineering measurements (waveforms, DC components and so
forth) to be made. If Levi measured, for example, that there was no DC
offset, chances are Rossi would either allow him to say that or choose
not to release any test data. We would avoid the ridiculous position
that we are in now, when some data is released (e.g. power output) but
other data is withheld (e.g. power input), for who knows what reason?
On 5/26/2013 1:16 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
From: "Duncan Cumming" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 12:53:45 PM
He can use an NDA if he is worried about trade secrets.
With whom? Levi et al? Since they're being called co-conspirators, what extra weight
would derive from their saying "I saw the sekrit data under an NDA."
