> From: "Jed Rothwell" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:20:43 AM
> 
> "Comments on the report 'Indication of anomalous heat energy
> production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel
> powder' by Giuseppe Levi et al."
> 
> 
> Peter Ekström, Department of Physics, Lund University
> 
> http://nuclearphysics.nuclear.lu.se/lpe/files/62739576.pdf
> 
> 
> This document stands as its own rebuttal.

In line 1 he makes a dig at Rossi's spelling "indipendent" : that's NOT in the 
paper.

Yes, it was originally written in Italian and translated. So? 

He follows Motl in treating the outer cylinder as steel, not 
steel-ceramic-paint.
Did we do the math on this?

It was very clearly explained in the paper why they went for a lower COP in 
March.

He's following Krivit (or MaryYugo, but they're the same person, aren't they?) 
on Levi/Rossi being "old buddies". There's no evidence that Levi met Rossi 
before the Dec 2010 test, and was introduced to him by Forcadi.


etc etc

Reply via email to