> From: "Joshua Cude" <joshua.c...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 3:02:02 PM
> I'm talking about the December test, when a different paint was used. > I don't think we know anything about the emissivity of that paint, > nor it's dependence on wavelength. Then forget about the December test. The authors admit that it had certain deficiencies, which were corrected in March. > In the March test, the power estimate was better, though far from > good, but the input was dodgier. OK --- so you agree that the March output is correct to .... say 25% ? 50% ? Then comes down to the input. EITHER : a) It was AC and the measurements are fine (say to 10%) b) Rossi used a wire or DC or ... fake c) They're all bought and paid by Rossi.
