Then I ask you to visit this thread and comment. No one had anything else to say after I talked about P&F's meltdown.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg77082.html On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > it is a surface phenomenon rather than a bulk phenomenon > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Let us take an example…A crack with two faces or two nano-particles >> separated by a few nano-meters can separate charge through dipole >> vibration >> with electrons gathering on one side of the crack or nano-particle and >> electrons on the other face of the crack or the other nano-particle. >> ***Does this mean for your polariton hypothesis to be true that it is a >> surface phenomenon rather than a bulk phenomenon? I would think that BECs >> are a bulk phenomenon, with the EFFECTs of the nuclear reactions getting >> pushed out to the surface like a river washes a landslide & a bunch of >> trees to a chokepoint. You notice the backed up river at the chokepoint >> but that isn't where the actual phenomenon took place. >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >
