Now, wait a second. After responding to this and seeing your lack of response, then repeating the same thing on another thread it leads me to re-examine what you wrote. Perhaps you are saying here that near-zero BECs have formed in Metal Hydrides? If so, then how can you say on the other thread
Why invoke a structure that is known not to form at high temperature? http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg82949.html Then that means BECs have been known to form in metal hydrides, or you are pretending like we never had this conversation about BECs forming at high temperatures. Which is it? Or perhaps there's an in-between thing I'm overlooking, that no doubt would save face for one or both of us? On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > Kevin, I see no evidence in the link for the actual existence of a BEC > forming between hydrons at room temperature. People have proposed but not > demonstrated. > > Ed Storms > > On May 27, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > > The BEC is known from experience and theory to only form near absolute > zero. > ***How quickly you forget having logged onto this thread: > > Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room > Temperature<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+%5BVo%5D%3ABose+Einstein+Condensate+formed+at+Room+Temperature%22> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg76596.html > > And this thread was greeted with a yawn: > [Vo]:Re: Superheated Bose-Einstein condensate exists above critical > temperature<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22%5BVo%5D%3ARe%3A+Superheated+Bose-Einstein+condensate+exists+above+critical+temperature%22> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg78827.html > > > > >
