Let's make sure I understand these 4 plots. I understand your diagram thus:
The blue square wave goes through your toy model and emerges as the green double exponential. The blue triangular wave goes through your toy model and emerges as the green curve that looks very like the power curve in the report. The toy model describes a thermal simulation which translates electrical input to the device to radiant power output. OK so far? Assuming yes, here's what I think you've shown. The control box consumes power as a square wave (which is what the report measures on the input side), and outputs a triangular wave to the device. The device's output power profile (radiant heat) comes out as per the report. Bazinga. The only problem is that the cable between the control box and the device contains "secrets". That's your next reverse-engineering mission :) Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Fletcher" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform, supports David Roberson's linear-response theory >> From: "Andrew" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:53:45 PM >> That's a nice piece of reverse engineering - Kudos. My only issue >> with it is >> the plot in the report, which definitely shows square waves. Mind >> you, these >> were measured on the input side of the control box. So it's possible >> you've uncovered a secret about the actual drive waveform. > > The square waves are the INPUT stimulus. The wavy line (eg plot 8) is the > OUTPUT power. > > But the general shape will be similar. > > (I displayed voltage ... equivalent to temperature. I still have lots to do. >
